Total memory bandwidth on the top models should increase by 50% relative to the RX 6950 XT. Which does make us wonder if perhaps these rumored specs are inflated, or if real-world throughput will be lower. Even the mid-tier chip would have a potential 38.4 teraflops, nearly double what the RX 6900 XT currently delivers. With up to 12,288 GPU shaders each doing an FP32 FMA (Fused Multiply Accumulate) operation each cycle, that would potentially give the top model 61.4 teraflops of compute, and double that for FP16 workloads. We don't expect AMD to walk back clocks relative to RDNA 2, and it's possible we'll see even higher clocks - perhaps the first GPU to break 3.0 GHz? For now, a conservative estimate of 2.5 GHz provides a rough guess at total compute. Note that the smallest die, Navi 33, will retain the same monolithic design as current GPUs.Ĭlock speeds are mostly placeholders for now. AMD will refer to the chips as the GCD (Graphics Chiplet Die) and MCD (Memory Chiplet Die), according to Angstronomics. AMD will also use GPU chiplets for the first time with RDNA 3, and the most credible sources indicate it will be breaking out the memory controllers and Infinity Cache from the main compute die. Logically, there will be multiple graphics card models using each GPU. We may eventually see a similar lineup from RX 7000, but we're only aware of three core GPUs at present: Navi 31, Navi 32, and Navi 33. The existing RDNA 2 and RX 6000-series GPUs currently consist of four GPU designs spread out across a full dozen different graphics card models - and that's not counting integrated graphics solutions. AMD RDNA 3 GPU Specifications (Rumor and Speculation) Architecture
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |